How Regulators Categorise Tokens
Whether an asset is a security, a commodity, an electronic money token or something else determines which rules apply. The categories differ by jurisdiction.
ELENA VOSS · · 2 min read
Classification is the question underneath most regulatory disputes in this sector, because the category determines the rulebook.
The common categories
Payment or exchange tokens. Assets intended as a medium of exchange with no issuer promising a return. Typically outside securities regulation and inside anti-money-laundering frameworks.
Utility tokens. Granting access to a service. Treated differently across jurisdictions, with some regimes creating a specific category and others assessing case by case.
Asset-referenced and electronic money tokens. Stablecoins, split by whether they reference a single currency or a basket. Subject to reserve, redemption and disclosure requirements in the frameworks that define them.
Security tokens. Assets representing an investment with an expectation of profit from the efforts of others. Full securities regulation applies.
Commodities. In some jurisdictions, certain assets are treated as commodities, with derivatives regulated and spot markets less so.
Why the same asset is categorised differently
Because the tests differ.
Some regimes apply a substance-based test asking whether the arrangement functions as an investment contract. Others define categories in legislation with specific criteria.
An asset that fails one test and passes another is categorised differently in two markets, which is the normal situation rather than an anomaly.
What follows from the category
Who may offer it. Securities require authorised intermediaries.
What disclosure is required. Prospectus obligations attach to some categories and not others.
Which venues may list it. A venue licensed for crypto-asset services may not be licensed for securities.
How holders are taxed, in some jurisdictions, though tax treatment frequently follows its own rules.
The practical consequence for users
Asset availability differs by country on the same platform, because the classification differs.
Reclassification causes delistings. When a regulator takes a position that an asset is a security, venues without the relevant permission must stop offering it, and holders receive a withdrawal window.
That is the mechanism by which classification reaches ordinary users, and it arrives as a delisting notice with a deadline.
What to check
Which assets your venue offers in your market, which is determined by the classification position in that jurisdiction.
Venues publishing their listing criteria and the jurisdictions they serve, such as exchanges licensed in the jurisdiction, make it possible to anticipate this rather than discover it in a notice.
The direction of travel
Toward defined categories in legislation rather than case-by-case assessment, in most major markets.
That reduces uncertainty for firms and it means the category boundaries become the thing to watch, because an asset near a boundary can move across it when guidance is issued.
Spotted an error? Corrections are published with a note at the foot of the article.Send the details.